industry awards strategic importance recognition

Stop Treating Industry Awards As Afterthoughts

joel_comm
By
Joel Comm
Joel is a New York Times Best-selling author – focused on cryptocurrency, marketing, social media and online business. An Internet pioneer, Joel has been creating profitable...
6 Min Read

Every year, people scramble at the last minute to pull together award entries. That rush says less about talent and more about how we treat recognition in our field. My view is simple: awards should be planned with the same care as campaigns. A new entry guide for the 2026 Ad Age Leading Women and Rising Star Awards makes that easier—and gives us fewer excuses.

“A practical entry guide for the 2026 Ad Age Leading Women and Rising Star Awards with eligibility, what to include, pricing, deadlines and links to submit. The final deadline is May 13, 2026 at 5 p.m. ET.”

Why This Guide Matters

This isn’t just another checklist. It signals a push for clarity and accessibility. When a guide lays out eligibility, what to include, pricing, and deadlines, it strips away guesswork. Clarity lowers barriers. It also pushes teams to measure impact and leadership in ways that are visible and fair.

I hear the same gripes each awards season: it’s expensive, it’s time-consuming, and it favors big names. Those concerns have weight. But they’re not the whole story. A practical, public guide can level the field—if we use it.

The Case for Entering Now

Recognition changes careers. It helps people negotiate raises, win budgets, and lead teams. For women and rising stars, that visibility is overdue. Waiting on recognition to arrive is not a strategy. Using a clear guide to submit a strong entry is.

The final deadline—May 13, 2026, at 5 p.m. ET—sets a firm clock. Deadlines can be harsh, but they also invite focus. Too many worthy stories never get told because people wait until the last week. Then they jam facts into a form and hope. Hope is not a submission strategy.

What Strong Entries Should Show

Great entries don’t hide behind buzzwords. They spell out impact in plain language. Based on the guide’s focus areas, here’s what I believe entrants should highlight:

  • Clear outcomes: measurable change, not vague success.
  • Leadership: decisions made, teams grown, ideas championed.
  • Originality: what was new, not just loud.
  • Resilience: obstacles faced and solved.
  • Ethics: results achieved without cutting corners.

These points help judges see the work and the person behind it. They also protect against entries that look shiny but say nothing.

The Cost Question and Access

Pricing matters, especially for freelancers, small shops, and early-career folks. I won’t pretend entry fees don’t sting. But I will say this: if a guide puts pricing up front, teams can plan and budget. That transparency is a step in the right direction. It invites leaders to sponsor entries for people who might skip them otherwise.

There’s a counterargument that awards reward those who already have resources. Fair. But skipping the process won’t fix that. Pushing for fee waivers, category diversity, and transparent criteria will. Using the guide to meet the standard—and then pressing organizers to widen access—moves change faster than sitting out.

Deadline Discipline Is Respect

There’s power in a hard date. May 13, 2026, at 5 p.m. ET, is not flexible. Treating that clock with respect shows respect for the judges, the entrants, and the work. Rushed entries waste good stories. The people who lose out are often the ones these awards aim to lift.

Start now. Draft the narrative. Gather metrics. Get approvals. Ask mentors to review. Bring receipts, not platitudes.

What I Want to See This Year

I want to see entries that talk about results in plain numbers and plain English. I want leaders who lift teams, not just themselves. I want rising stars who took smart risks and learned fast. And I want organizations to put their money where their press releases are, funding entries for those who need the boost.

Most of all, I want fewer “we meant to submit” stories the week after the deadline. If a practical guide exists, the only thing in the way is will.

Final Thought

This guide hands us structure. The rest is on us. Plan like it matters, because it does. The clock is loud: May 13, 2026, 5 p.m. ET. Use the time well.

Call to action: pick one candidate today—yourself or someone you lead—and commit to submitting. Block time, gather proof, and write with clarity. If you lead a team, fund at least one entry. Recognition doesn’t happen by accident. It happens because we decide the work—and the people who do it—deserve to be seen.

Share This Article
Follow:
Joel is a New York Times Best-selling author – focused on cryptocurrency, marketing, social media and online business. An Internet pioneer, Joel has been creating profitable websites, software, products and training since 1995.